Quantcast
Xbox 360 Playstation 3 Nintendo Wii iPhone Video Game Reviews iPhone App Search Playstation Portable Computer PC Games Playstation 2 Games Gear and Accessories for Games Nintendo DS  
Archives Video Media Articles Games Cheats Files Forums

   GENERAL
  Community
  Upcoming Releases
  Latest Releases
  Video Game List
  Game Reviews
  Weekly Game Giveaways!
  Inside The Games
  Previews
  iPhone App Search
   Weekly Features
  Good, Bad and Shipping
  BitMaps
  Rumor Killers
  The Bargain Bin
  Very British Gamer
   PodCasts
  Game On
  Big Red Potion
  Game Zombie TV
   SECTIONS
  Downloads
  Gamer Blogs
  Videos
  Game Cheats
  Top 10 Games
  Screenshots
   WEBSITE
  TGR Staff
  Write With Us
  Advertising Information
  Submit Gaming News
  Submit a Review
  Submit Content
  Video Game Advertising
   Video Game Industry
  Resources
  Video Game Industry Events
  Features and Opinion
  Video Game Company List
Affiliated with:
GameZone.com

Friends:

360 sync


360 Voice

iPhone Sites

iPhone App Index

iPhone App Reviews
Game Reviews Index » Articles Send this page to a friend
BITMAPS 56: Why Prince of Persia Reviews Are Wrong
Posted by Lawrence Sonntag, 355 days ago

No more 80s slang

That statement is true for all games, to a degree. Control interpretation is a fundamental part of any game. I can hear the nerd rage building within you, but give me a second, this will all tie together in a bit. In any game, when the player presses a button, any on screen action is an interpretation of that press (unless the avatar on screen is also pressing a button). In Super Mario Bros, the player hits a button and the Italian jumps. While the two actions aren’t the same, the player feels ownership over the action due to a variety of elements – the immediacy of the action, the visual cue, and sound response (the boing sound, you know what it is).

 

 

Super Mario Bros

 

So far there’s no problem. The player feels in control and empowered. As is the case with Prince of Persia, the problems arise when players no longer feel like they’re directly in control of their avatar. More modern games with loads of animation have struggled with this. Say you have a character that’s running. At any moment, the player can instruct the character to jump, but how do you change from a running animation to a jumping animation in a smooth way?

Non-realistic games like Super Mario Galaxy can get around this because, well, it’s not realistic. Who cares if a cartoon immediately changes from a run to a jump? However, when a realistic-looking dude launches airbone instantly from a full sprint… it just looks weird. One solution is to throw a few frames of animation in there to transition from the run to the jump. Now there’s a slight delay between the push and the action, and the player feels just a bit disconnected. The two are related inversely; the more animation, the better the looks, but the looser the controls.

PoP opted to go full-bore with animation and as a result the game looks great. The Prince’s moves are smooth as hell (which I assure you is quite smooth, not firey and red as Christian dogma would have you believe), and platforming segments are entirely seamless. Such animation introduces a conundrum involving controls. Either you require precise timing with no easy way to indicate to the player exactly when they need to hit the button – aside from, y’know, putting a button on the screen – or you open the timing window to reduce the frustration. Either you get people complaining that the game is cheap and needlessly frustrating (Mirror’s Edge), or you get people complaining that it’s not cheap and needlessly frustrating enough. Freaking internet, damned if you do, damned if you don’t.


Rating: 2.3, votes: 10
 
Comments
Rules
1. No cursing or swear words: Use proper language to express yourself.
2. No flooding or spamming the comment system, abuse will result in a ban.

You may not post comments as a guest. Please register or login to your account.
  #1 Dec 9, 2008 11:02:09 354 days ago
GDM Hard-Boiled
4 Comments

I would have to agree with you 100%

Im playing this right now, and it is amazing, the interaction btween the Prince and Princess is epic!

I like this game because not only can I play it, so can my wife. Not everything has to be Halo, or Gears, etc...


  #2 Dec 9, 2008 22:08:00 354 days ago
Syc45
2 Comments

I agree with mostly everything said here. Some reviewers are paid to give some games "x" score. So they basically search high and low for anything to bash the game.

But, I kinda disagree about the easy comment. To me, if a game isn’t at least semi-hard, then I’ll kind of "eh" it. I mean, does the girl save you every single time you die or fall off a ledge that will kill you? Also, does it start from exaclty the point you were at with all the same health and what not? I haven’t played it yet, but if this is so, then I basically see no obstacle to overcome. No, "I’ll do this instead of this." Take Street Fighter for example, when you are fighting somebody and you die, you have to start over on a new round, where your opponent has restored health. It isn’t, ok, I’ll take his health down a little bit, die, then repeat until he is dead. You have to actually think of a strategy and what you are doing, to overcome that obstacle. See, in the other PoP games, you had the sands of time which you could rewind what you are doing, but only a limited amount of times.

Now, I’m not saying this feature is a bad one. But what if someone didn’t want that to happen? Is there an option to take that off? If so, then sure, blow my whole viewpoint out of the water. I’m not trying to bash your opinion on the matter either, just giving a friendly view. But good review otherwise,


 


Video Game Reviews Twitter
Weekly Video Game Podcasts
Inside The Games

Game Reviews | Weekly Contests | Submit News | Contact | Pages | Blogs | Forums | Video Game Reviews | Video | RSS | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions

iphone game
The Game Reviews Picks of the Month: Halo Wars | Killzone 2 | Street Fighter 4 | Resident Evil 5 | Tom Clancy's HAWX