Quantcast
Xbox 360 Playstation 3 Nintendo Wii iPhone Video Game Reviews iPhone App Search Playstation Portable Computer PC Games Playstation 2 Games Gear and Accessories for Games Nintendo DS  
Archives Video Media Articles Games Cheats Files Forums

   GENERAL
  Community
  Upcoming Releases
  Latest Releases
  Video Game List
  Game Reviews
  Weekly Game Giveaways!
  Inside The Games
  Previews
  iPhone App Search
   Weekly Features
  Good, Bad and Shipping
  BitMaps
  Rumor Killers
  The Bargain Bin
  Very British Gamer
   PodCasts
  Game On
  Big Red Potion
  Game Zombie TV
   SECTIONS
  Downloads
  Gamer Blogs
  Videos
  Game Cheats
  Top 10 Games
  Screenshots
   WEBSITE
  TGR Staff
  Write With Us
  Advertising Information
  Submit Gaming News
  Submit a Review
  Submit Content
  Video Game Advertising
   Video Game Industry
  Resources
  Video Game Industry Events
  Features and Opinion
  Video Game Company List
Affiliated with:
GameZone.com

Friends:

360 sync


360 Voice

iPhone Sites

iPhone App Index

iPhone App Reviews
Game Reviews Index » Articles Send this page to a friend
BITMAPS 56: Why Prince of Persia Reviews Are Wrong
Posted by Lawrence Sonntag, 354 days ago

Constructive

Obviously, Ubi Montreal went with the wider timing, and I couldn’t be happier. However, apparently gamers need to lose, or at least have the real threat of failure, before a victory has any value. For many of the reviewers I’ve read, just realizing that victory comes easily robs it of any enjoyment. I’m not sure why this is – are gamers’ egos so weak that they can’t bear to enjoy a victory unless they feel they have ripped it from the jaws of defeat? I can understand cautioning against the game to players that want a good challenge, but calling the game bad simply because it’s easy doesn’t compute at all.

The other half of the argument is more poignant; that the wide window on the controls breaks the illusion that the player is actually in control. To me, this smacks of players that blame a game for having any kind if cheat available, because that means they just have to use them. Just because the timing window is really wide doesn’t mean the player has to use it. Even cognizant of the wide window, I pressed the buttons the instant the Prince reached the ledge / pole / ring / whatever while playing. Even though the game didn’t require me to be so precise, being precise anyway created the illusion of control.

One might say that fooling one’s self in this way is cheap and shouldn’t be required. However, thanks to the aforementioned translating process of videogame actions, all controls are based on illusion. Until we get full-body sensory immersion VR suits, this will be true of any videogame. Besides, by the time we get full VR suits we’ll be living in a dystopian future where renegade AI cyborgs will be running around trying to kill us, so we’ll have bigger fish to fry. Plus there will be flying cars then, and once I get one of those I probably won’t need a videogame for a while.

 

 

Bladerunner

Flying car or Madden 2019… easy choice.

 

PoP has removed several of the behind-the-scenes conventions that gamers are used to; chief among those being the potential for failure. Even so, why should that ruin the fun? These reviewers are the guys that can’t wait to tell you that space shouldn’t have sound when you talk about Star Wars, or just can’t get why Romeo and Juliet didn’t book it out of Verona the moment they got married. Try to have fun with a game before you look for all the ways you can’t.


Rating: 2.3, votes: 10
 
Comments
Rules
1. No cursing or swear words: Use proper language to express yourself.
2. No flooding or spamming the comment system, abuse will result in a ban.

You may not post comments as a guest. Please register or login to your account.
  #1 Dec 9, 2008 11:02:09 353 days ago
GDM Hard-Boiled
4 Comments

I would have to agree with you 100%

Im playing this right now, and it is amazing, the interaction btween the Prince and Princess is epic!

I like this game because not only can I play it, so can my wife. Not everything has to be Halo, or Gears, etc...


  #2 Dec 9, 2008 22:08:00 353 days ago
Syc45
2 Comments

I agree with mostly everything said here. Some reviewers are paid to give some games "x" score. So they basically search high and low for anything to bash the game.

But, I kinda disagree about the easy comment. To me, if a game isn’t at least semi-hard, then I’ll kind of "eh" it. I mean, does the girl save you every single time you die or fall off a ledge that will kill you? Also, does it start from exaclty the point you were at with all the same health and what not? I haven’t played it yet, but if this is so, then I basically see no obstacle to overcome. No, "I’ll do this instead of this." Take Street Fighter for example, when you are fighting somebody and you die, you have to start over on a new round, where your opponent has restored health. It isn’t, ok, I’ll take his health down a little bit, die, then repeat until he is dead. You have to actually think of a strategy and what you are doing, to overcome that obstacle. See, in the other PoP games, you had the sands of time which you could rewind what you are doing, but only a limited amount of times.

Now, I’m not saying this feature is a bad one. But what if someone didn’t want that to happen? Is there an option to take that off? If so, then sure, blow my whole viewpoint out of the water. I’m not trying to bash your opinion on the matter either, just giving a friendly view. But good review otherwise,


 


Video Game Reviews Twitter
Weekly Video Game Podcasts
Inside The Games

Game Reviews | Weekly Contests | Submit News | Contact | Pages | Blogs | Forums | Video Game Reviews | Video | RSS | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions

iphone game
The Game Reviews Picks of the Month: Halo Wars | Killzone 2 | Street Fighter 4 | Resident Evil 5 | Tom Clancy's HAWX